Guides
Part of Provider comparisons: a small-business evaluation method
How to build a provider comparison scorecard
Build a provider comparison scorecard in three moves: set pass/fail gates, weight what your business cannot lose, and score written answers before you sign.
Once two quotes describe the same product, the choice is still not obvious. One is cheaper, the other offers a firmer repair commitment, and the term differs. A scorecard turns that argument into something you can show a partner and check against your own instinct before any money is committed.
What to take away
- Write the criteria and weights before the second quote is opened, or the favorite will set them quietly.
- Gates come firstan offer that fails a must-have is out, however cheap it is.
- Score from written answers, never from a sales call.
- If the winner surprises you, either your weights are wrong or your judgment was. Find out which before you sign.
Set the gates before you score anything
A gate is a pass or fail requirement, not a weighted preference. Decide yours before you see a second offer. Any quote that fails one drops out, because scoring a failed offer only gives it a chance it has not earned.
Good gates come from the failures that would hurt your work. A shop's card terminal tolerates a bad hour, while a building full of people on calls does not. That difference decides whether a shared service can pass at all, a point the business internet comparison takes further.
Typical gates for a connectivity quote:
- The upload figure is stated separately from the download figure.
- The delivery method is named, not hidden behind a sales label.
- The quote names the exact address, not the street.
- A repair commitment is written down, with a stated cost to the provider for missing it.
Normalizing comes before scoring, because a score built on mismatched fields only rewards whichever offer words things most vaguely. Take the fields in the table below and correct each quote, one field at a time, so the columns line up, before you
Normalize Both Offers
Field
- Delivery method
- Fiber, copper, coaxial, cellular, radio
- Direction
- Upload separate from download
- Sharing
- Dedicated or shared capacity
- Term
- Same months both sides
- Install work
- Civil, cabling, wayleave included
- Equipment
- Owned, rented, or reclaimed
- Addresses
- Exact address, not postcode
Normalize to
- Delivery method
- Direction
- Sharing
- Term
- Install work
- Equipment
- Addresses
Weight what your work cannot afford to lose
Weights say which failure would hurt most. Give each criterion a share of the total and use the same shares for every offer. Write them down early. Once a favorite emerges, weights drift toward whatever it happens to do well, and the scorecard stops being a test.
| Criterion | Question behind the weight | High score looks like | Low score looks like |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capacity at busy times | How badly does a poor hour hurt us? | A minimum or a ratio stated in the contract | Only a maximum is quoted |
| Upload direction | Do calls and backups lean on upload? | Upload stated on its own line | One number for both directions |
| Repair | How long can we be down? | A commitment with a consequence for missing it | A commitment with no consequence |
| Night faults | Who reports a fault out of hours? | A channel anyone on staff can use | A portal only one departed contractor can log into |
| Inside the walls | Who fixes the cabling? | The demarcation point is stated and agreed | Responsibility stops at a box on the outside wall |
| End of term | Can we leave cleanly? | Month-to-month or a stated renewal price | Automatic renewal or a price change |
| Account control | Who can authorize a change? | A named person on your side | Unclear, which blocks moving numbers later |
The capacity row deserves the most thought. A shared medium divides what the local segment can carry among everyone connected to it, so the quoted figure is a ceiling, not a floor. That is why the shared product costs less. A cellular segment behaves the same way, as 5G business internet describes.
Dedicated vs Shared Capacity
Dedicated circuit
- Capacity
- Same every hour
- Contract figure
- Guaranteed
- Cost
- Higher
- Key question
- Not applicable
Shared medium
- Capacity
- Divided at busy times
- Contract figure
- Ceiling, not floor
- Cost
- Lower
- Key question
- What happens at 4pm?
To size that weight, count simultaneous users, not headcount. The FCC's broadband speed guide lists typical requirements by activity. Its household broadband guide shows how simultaneous use adds up.
Score from written answers only
Only a written answer earns points. Send the same questions to every provider by email and score the replies, not the call. An answer in writing can be checked later, and a refusal to answer is itself information about what the provider can predict.
Ask These in Writing
- Path from here to network
- Demarcation point
- Repair commitment and penalty
- Out-of-hours fault reporting
- End-of-term outcome
- Who can authorize changes
Then run the sheet in four steps:
- List the gates and criteria down the side, with one column for each offer.
- Fix every weight before any quote is scored.
- Score one criterion across all offers at a time, on one scale such as 0 to 3, so one polished answer does not color the rest.
- Multiply, total, and lay the totals beside your own first instinct.
Money gets its own score, but only after the gates are passed. The parts of a quote to total first are set out in reading a connectivity quote, and the account-control row ties to how business phone numbers move later.
Read the result back
Compare the winner with your own judgment. If it surprises you, either your weights are wrong or your judgment was, and both are worth finding out before you sign. Change a weight only when you can say why in one sentence, never to rescue a favorite.
A close result deserves a second look at the term. Automatic renewal, a price change and a month-to-month arrangement are three different outcomes, so a narrow winner that renews automatically can be a worse deal than a runner-up that does not.
Keep the losing offers. When the winner disappoints in month four, the file of what you compared stops you repeating the exercise from nothing. It also gives you a ready shortlist when the term ends, and moving over safely covers the order of that switch.
Common questions
How many criteria should a scorecard hold?
Few enough that each weight means something. If everything is weighted high, nothing is. Start from the failures you could not tolerate and stop when the list stops growing.
Should price be a gate or a score?
Treat it as a score, after the offers pass the gates. A low price on a product that fails a gate is not a saving. Total the whole term, not just the monthly figure.
What if two offers tie?
Let the highest-weighted criterion decide, then the end of the term, because the term is what is hard to leave.
Can one scorecard serve two sites?
Reuse the criteria, not the shares. A shop's card terminal and a building full of people on calls need different weights, even from the same provider.
